Fromms Fourth Personality TypeNot long after Freud described his three personality types in 1931, German psychoanalyst Erich Fromm proposed a fourth personality type, which has become particularly prevalent in todays service economy. Fromm called this type the marketing personality, and it is exemplified by the lead character in Woody Allens movie Zelig, a man who is so governed by his need to be valued that he becomes exactly like the people he happens to be around. Marketing personalities are more detached than erotics and so are less likely to cement close ties. They are also less driven by conscience than obsessives. Instead, they are motivated by a radarlike anxiety that permeates everything they do. Because they are so eager to please and to alleviate this anxiety, marketing personalities excel at selling themselves to others. Unproductive marketing types lack direction, as well as the ability to commit themselves to people or projects. But when productive, marketing types are good at facilitating teams and keeping the focus on adding value as defined by customers and colleagues. Like obsessives, marketing personalities are avid consumers of self-help books. Like narcissists, they are not wedded to the past. But marketing types generally make poor leaders in times of crisis. They lack the daring needed to innovate and are too responsive to currentrather than futurecustomer demands. |
Working for a NarcissistDealing with a narcissistic boss isnt easy. You have to be prepared to look for another job if your boss becomes too narcissistic to let you disagree with him. But remember that the company is typically betting on his vision of the futurenot yours. Here are a few tips on how to survive in the short term:
|
The Rise and Fall of a NarcissistThe story of Jan Carlzon, the former CEO of the Scandinavian airline SAS, is an almost textbook example of how the narcissists weaknesses can cut short a brilliant career. In the 1980s, Carlzons vision of SAS as the businesspersons airline was widely acclaimed in the business press; management guru Tom Peters described him as a model leader. In 1989, when I first met Carlzon and his management team, he compared the ideal organization to the Brazilian soccer teamin principle, there would be no fixed roles, only innovative plays. I asked the members of the management team if they agreed with this vision of an empowered front line. One vice president, a former pilot, answered no. I still believe that the best organization is the military, he said. I then asked Carlzon for his reaction to this remark. Well, he replied, that may be true, if your goal is to shoot your customers. That rejoinder was both witty and dismissive. Clearly, Carlzon was not engaging in a serious dialogue with his subordinates. Nore was he listening to other advisers. Carlzon ignored the issue of high costs, even when many observers pointed out that SAS could not compete without improving productivity. He threw money at expensive acquisitions of hotels and made an unnecessary investment in Continental Airlines just months before it declared bankruptcy. Carlzons story perfectly corroborates the often-recorded tendency of narcissists to become overly expansiveand hence isolatedat the very pinnacle of their success. Seduced by the flattery he received in the international press, Carlzons self-image became so enormously inflated that his feet left the ground. And given his vulnerability to grandiosity, he was propelled by a need to expand his organization rather than develop it. In due course, as Carlzon led the company deeper and deeper into losses, he was fired. Now he is a venture capitalist helping budding companies. And SAS has lost its glitter. |